Yes, of course the photo was taken by a miniature person sitting on my right shoulder. It would be quite irresponsible for me to use a camera single-handed while driving at any speed!
Speedo accuracy is an interesting question.
My car started off in 1967 as a 1.3 Zagato Sport with a four-speed box, skinny wheels (145SR-14) and a 120mph speedo. The Oude Weernink book shows this should have had a final drive of 10/37 giving it 18mph per 1000rpm in top gear.
My car now has a 1600cc engine, five-speed box from a 1600 Sport, runs on alloy wheels with 175SR-14 tyres and has a 140mph speedo. The book shows the 1600 Sport had a final drive of 11/39, which on 165-14 tyres gave it 19.9mph per 1000rpm in top gear. The same final drive ratio was used in the Flavia 2000 coupe HF, which on 175-14 tyres gave it 20.3mph per 1000rpm in top. It is this latter figure that should apply to my car.
It is this unusual combination of high final drive ratio and large tyres that give my car such long legs, which makes it a touring car compared to the short legged sprinting quality of the coupe. I like it that way.
As to accuracy, all I can say is that I have checked the mileometer against motorway mile-posts over a 100 mile stretch of the M4 and it is accurate to better than 1%. It’s not easy to verify the accuracy of the speedo itself, but I have always thought that mine might tend to under-record because of running on larger tyres/ wheel diameter than intended. It looks to me that my car does 21.2mph per 1000rpm.
Incidentally, I have experience of four different Fulvia non-metric speedos, from early 120mph units and later HF 140mph units – they were all marked “1610 revs = 1M” (Mile). This suggests that Lancia simply ignored the errors that would arise from different wheel and tyre sizes!
Colin