|
Title: The Old 100 Post by: davidwheeler on 01 November, 2014, 09:41:12 AM Sombre thought: I read that the late great Hugh Ross was member no. 75. I am no. 95! How many of The Old 100 are left?
Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: lancialulu on 01 November, 2014, 06:04:09 PM David
I asked the current membership secretary Sarah and current membership there are 26 members in the 0-100 range, 9 of which are registered on this forum. Hope this gives some encouragement! Tim Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: Chris Hopkins on 02 November, 2014, 06:19:02 PM John Millham is number 64 and is active on the Forum. Anyone earlier?
Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: ben on 03 November, 2014, 10:26:54 PM A quick scan of the register shows Gerald Batt as having the lowest number at 23. I don't think he is active on here however.
A surprising number of the old 100's are in Australia. Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: Parisien on 03 November, 2014, 10:34:27 PM A quick scan of the register shows Gerald Batt as having the lowest number at 23. I don't think he is active on here however. A surprising number of the old 100's are in Australia. As are quite a high proportion of the surviving eldest Lancias. P Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: donw on 04 November, 2014, 12:18:05 PM You can't necessarily rely on the membership number for the earliest members. Although some will have been "original" issue. In the sixties Frank Barkway the Secretary recycled numbers, when I joined he asked me what number I would like, of those available I chose 111.
Don Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: rogerelias on 04 November, 2014, 04:19:14 PM Don't know what my dads was, he joined in 1955
Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: fay66 on 04 November, 2014, 06:14:32 PM I joined in 1993 with 8227, surely there wasn't been over 8000 members in that time? interesting to know what are we up to 21 years on?
Brian 8227 8) Title: Re: The Old 100 Post by: brian on 04 November, 2014, 08:43:00 PM DonW 111 in 1964 and I am 117 in 1980 (from memory!) so numbers fairly meaningless.
|